as-healthcare-administrators-there-are-a-number-of-legal-and-ethical-issues-that-may-need-your-consideration-review-the-following-case-study-and-address-the-questions-that-follow-from-1930-to-1960-about-5-000-patients-at-michael-reese-ho | Term Paper Tutors

Calculate the Price


Price (USD): $11

Introduction:

As healthcare administrators, there are a number of legal and ethical issues that may need your consideration.

Review the following case study and address the questions that follow:

From 1930 to 1960, about 5,000 patients at Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center, located in Chicago, Illinois, were treated with x-ray therapy for some benign conditions of the head and neck. Among them was Joel Blaz, now a citizen of Florida, who received this treatment for infected tonsils and adenoids while he was a child in Illinois from 1947 through 1948. He has suffered various tumors, which he now attributes to this treatment. Blaz was diagnosed with a neural tumor in 1987.

In 1974, Michael Reese set up the Thyroid Follow-Up Project to gather data and conduct research among the people who had been subjected to the x-ray therapy. In 1975, the program notified Blaz by e-mail that he was at increased risk of developing thyroid tumors because of the treatment. In 1976, someone associated with the program gave him similar information on a phone call and invited him to return to Michael Reese for evaluation and treatment at his own expense, which he declined to do.

Dr. Arthur Schneider was placed in charge of the program in 1977. In 1979, Schneider and Michael Reese submitted a research proposal to the National Institutes of Health stating that a study based on the program showed “strong evidence” of a connection between x-ray treatments of the sort administered to Blaz and various sorts of tumors: thyroid, neural, and others. In 1981, Blaz received but did not complete or return a questionnaire attached to a letter from Schneider in connection with the program. The letter stated that the purpose of the questionnaire was to “investigate the long-term health implications” of childhood radiation treatments and to “determine the possible associated risks.” It did not say anything about “strong evidence” of a connection between the treatments and any tumors.

In 1996, after developing neural tumors, Blaz sued Michael Reese’s successor, Galen Hospital in Illinois, and Dr. Schneider, alleging, among other things, that they failed to notify and warn him of their findings and that he might be at a greater risk of neural tumors in a way that might have permitted their earlier detection and removal or other treatment. There is a clear duty to warn the subject of previously administered radiation treatments when there is a strong connection between those treatments and certain kinds of tumors. The harm alleged, neural and other tumors would here be reasonably foreseeable as a likely consequence of the failure to warn and was in fact foreseen by Schneider.

A reasonable physician, indeed any reasonable person, could foresee that if someone was warned of “strong evidence” of a connection between treatments to which he or she had been subjected and tumors, he or she would probably seek diagnosis or treatment and perhaps avoid these tumors, and if he or she was not warned, then he or she probably would not seek diagnosis or treatment, increasing the likelihood that he or she would suffer from such tumors. Other things being equal, therefore, a reasonable physician would warn the subject of the treatments.

Tasks:

  • Discuss the preventative measures that should be taken to prevent recurrence of such cases.

As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

Your initial posting should be addressed at 300–500 words. Submit your document to this Discussion Area by the due date assigned. Be sure to cite your sources using APA format.

"Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you with a guaranteed plagiarism-free A+ quality paper. Discount Code: SUPER50!"

order custom paper
The World's Best Writers

Unlike other essay writing companies, we don’t just use any writers – we use the best of the best. Every writer is not only directly qualified in the subject they write for, but has been through and understands the challenges and difficulties of Higher Education.

Every writer is hand selected by our team to produce the best piece of work possible. We simply won’t settle for less.

18 Years in Business

Ever since we started back in 2003, we’ve led the industry from the front, setting trends and smashing expectations. We were the first company in the world to offer you guaranteed 2:1 and 1st class work and we’re one of the few companies located in the UK.

Why don’t you come and say hello?

We Love Writing

At UK Best Essays, we’re proud to know exactly what goes into making an awesome essay. We’ve dedicated over 14 years towards becoming experts in all things academic – from essays, assignments and coursework, through to dissertations, exams, reports and reflections.

While others come and go, UK Best Essays has grown and developed into one of the world’s leading academic support companies. Got more questions about our services?

© 2022 All rights reserved. UK Best Essays is a professional writing service that provides original papers. Our products include academic papers of varying complexity and other personalized services, along with research materials for assistance purposes only. All the materials from our website should be used with proper references.